WebEfficiency wise, as long as all sphere area is covered with sails, the outcomes are similar until you worry about power density. The optimized design I referenced earlier would need 1.37E+05 (common) ore* per GW. A reasonable graticule design would need 1.43E+05 (common)* ore per GW. That's only about a 4% improvement! WebThis became known as a Dyson sphere. Science fiction writers later replaced the swarm of satellites with a solid shell. The swarm of satellites is a Type I Dyson sphere and the shell is a Type II Dyson sphere. Type II is probably impossible: the gravity of the sun would cause the poles of the sphere to collapse. Type I is quite feasible, though.
Dyson Sphere vs Dyson Swarm :: Dyson Sphere Program General …
WebThe Dyson sphere is a relatively sterile piece of brutalist architecture in your star systems where a swarm is a beautiful ring of "Happy Little Lights". I spent some time trying to find information on how to optimize your … WebFeb 14, 2024 · The max output 125MW I think is the max output you can draw from your dyson swarm/sphere into your ray receivers. But the energy received by individual ray receivers itself is the number between the two icons. On the right is a DNA-like symbol icon. ICON A --- XX MW --- ICON B rawlins high school wyoming
science based - How fast could we build a Dyson Swarm?
WebMay 3, 2024 · A Dyson sphere/swarm would go even farther, encircling or enveloping the entire Sun. NASA. For example, we could build a swarm in space to collect even more of the Sun's energy. Imagine a large ... WebMar 7, 2024 · If it could be stabilized, a Dyson Sphere built at 93 million miles from the sun, the same distance as Earth, would contain about 600 million times the surface area of … WebJul 30, 2024 · A Dyson sphere might be, say, the size of Earth’s orbit around the sun. We orbit at a distance of 93 million miles (about 150 million km). The website … simple handheld electric shocker